Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Metalocalypse trivia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Vote stacking
vote stacking? i have done no such thing vote stacking would be me making multiple accounts and then voting a bunch
- That's sockpuppeting. Get your terms straight. Read WP:SPAM. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well thats the closest thing i could finds as there is no rules against asking for support. i looked for what you meant and found nothing Please in the future try to get terms that make sense.
- It makes perfect sense. Asking for support votes from several users is vote-stacking, and your behavior in regards to me exposing you proves your intentions. Let the AfD finish instead of trying to disrupt the process. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- well you throw that word around but your definition is erroneous i really don't think you know what it means wiki dosn't have it? so please explain you special definition
- I'm not wasting my time with someone who's being deliberately belligerent. You can read. Click the link. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- what link plz help im being "deliberately belligerent" also i read the def i found myself i am not doing what you are claiming so im warning you to stop spreading liesBobthehun2 01:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- ohh noes i sent it to you and not just the other limited amount of people [1] [2]
- You did that after I called you on it. Honestly, will you just knock it off, already? – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- ONE defend or delete, TWO you left that post out,(after bold) i had to reinsert it, which disproves you. you have broken the rules my freind im still calling you on your misuse of the word(because it was only a limited amount and not in mass as the def says and also b4 you "called me" on it i posted it to people of various opinions{your forth link}) and where that link is also your attacks on my character are hurtful "why do you continue in this This Godless Endeavor?" also im going to delete this discussion if you can not validate your attackBobthehun2 01:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Blank this section and it will be restored. You are not allowed to remove others comments from a public discussion page. You have every right to do so on your own talk page, not here. I'm not going to continue discussion with someone who misrepresents my comments and desn't bother to read. It only wastes my time. The two links you cite have timeocdes almost an hour after my post. Your comments to each user page, including mine for an unfathomable reason, specifically say support. You're just acting ignorant to be disruptive, and it won't be tolerated. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- first of most of your posts are personal attacks on my character you say something i defend it and you attack my character. you have not defended yourself and failed to read. i posted support that is time coded before your post you have failed to read you will never be the man now dog Bobthehun2 02:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Blank this section and it will be restored. You are not allowed to remove others comments from a public discussion page. You have every right to do so on your own talk page, not here. I'm not going to continue discussion with someone who misrepresents my comments and desn't bother to read. It only wastes my time. The two links you cite have timeocdes almost an hour after my post. Your comments to each user page, including mine for an unfathomable reason, specifically say support. You're just acting ignorant to be disruptive, and it won't be tolerated. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- ONE defend or delete, TWO you left that post out,(after bold) i had to reinsert it, which disproves you. you have broken the rules my freind im still calling you on your misuse of the word(because it was only a limited amount and not in mass as the def says and also b4 you "called me" on it i posted it to people of various opinions{your forth link}) and where that link is also your attacks on my character are hurtful "why do you continue in this This Godless Endeavor?" also im going to delete this discussion if you can not validate your attackBobthehun2 01:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- You did that after I called you on it. Honestly, will you just knock it off, already? – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- ohh noes i sent it to you and not just the other limited amount of people [1] [2]
- what link plz help im being "deliberately belligerent" also i read the def i found myself i am not doing what you are claiming so im warning you to stop spreading liesBobthehun2 01:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not wasting my time with someone who's being deliberately belligerent. You can read. Click the link. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- well you throw that word around but your definition is erroneous i really don't think you know what it means wiki dosn't have it? so please explain you special definition
- It makes perfect sense. Asking for support votes from several users is vote-stacking, and your behavior in regards to me exposing you proves your intentions. Let the AfD finish instead of trying to disrupt the process. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well thats the closest thing i could finds as there is no rules against asking for support. i looked for what you meant and found nothing Please in the future try to get terms that make sense.
