Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mandalorian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Administrator's closing rationale

If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a new section below, do not inturrupt my comments here.

[edit] Raw count analysis

  • Delete
    • All
  1. EEMIV <nominator> (12 edits)
  2. Judgesurreal777 (2 edits)
  3. Funper (2 edits)
  4. Gavin.collins
  5. Doctorfluffy
  6. Jay32183
  1. Cryo921
  2. Sin Harvest
  • Keep
    • All
  1. Kizor (4 edits)
  2. Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles (7 edits)
  3. Colonel Warden (2 edits)
  1. Sin Harvest
  1. RogueNinja
  2. DGG
  3. Dorftrottel
  • Non-participatory
  1. DumbBOT - completing the listing process
  2. SineBot (edits=2) - doing that whole sinebot thing
  3. Jerry - relisting
  4. Gladys j cortez - comment with no discernable recommendation

# Dorftrottel (5 edits) - assumed to be sarcasm (or possibly drunk?)

  • Single-purpose accounts and/or suspected sockpuppets

none

[edit] Valid Delete Arguments

[edit] Discounted delete arguments

  • Better suited for Wookieepedia

[edit] Valid keep arguments

  • Primary sources are mentioned in the articles that verfify the content
  • 13 sources added during the afd
  • Google Scholar has references

[edit] Discounted keep arguments

  • Recognizable aspect of fictional universe
  • High level of reader interest
  • Probably covered in science fiction magazines

[edit] Summary

This was alot to sort through. Some bad faith and sarcasm made it a little difficult to grab as a snapshot. In the end there are certainly more people calling for deletion of most of these articles, and their arguments are more sound than the keepers. DGG's explanation sums it up best, methinks, the main article should not have been bundled here. As a standalone AFD, it would have probably been snowed... bundling it does not help matters... it makes for a messy afd like this one. My decision is Merge all into Mandalorian. Since this requires keeping the articles and redirecting them, and since I will not be the one doing the merging, this will result in a keep closure for all with instruction to editors to merge them accordingly. JERRY talk contribs 02:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)