Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Keith McLaughlin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The person has been a primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person.1

   * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, scholarly papers, and television documentaries2 except for the following:
         o Media reprints of the person's autobiography or self-promotional works.3
         o Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that just mention the person in passing, telephone directory listings, or simple records of births and deaths.4

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=sideboard/gpatl03/sf1

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=sideboard/gpatl03/qf1

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgevent/gpbost05/sf1

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgevent/gpmadi06/bloga1#6

http://www.starcitygames.com/php/news/event/5692.html

http://www.starcitygames.com/php/news/event/5693.html

Ok, so I think that criteria is covered.

1. Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, or at the highest level in mainly amateur sports or other competitive activities that are themselves considered notable, including college sports in the United States. Articles about first team squad members who have not made a first team appearance may also be appropriate, but only if the individual is at a club of sufficient stature that most members of its squad are worthy of articles. Third-party verification from a non-trivial publication outside of publications by sponsors of the sport or activity should be provided to demonstrate that the subject is widely recognized—meeting the first criterion—as performing in a fully professional league or at the highest level.

Perhaps I am making some misinterpretations here, but the inclusion of this article doesn't seem very unreasonable.