Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/J. Edward Anderson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Debate relevance and trolling

JzG, I thought my comments were noteworthy in the debate because it helps show the, IMO, higher standard you hold for anything related to PRT. You have been intertwined with Avidor for a while, including starting the article for his comic strip and defending it against being considered for deletion. I think you favor Avidor's position in regards to PRT and you edit and protect PRT against having any appearance that it might possibly work. I think others taking part in this debate might find the perspective useful. If your position wasn't tainted, I don't think the article would have been considered for deletion. In addition, I find it interesting that you deleted MY comments based on lack of relevance, but you left irrelevant comments from ThuranX, Knappster, and even every statement made by Avidor. Since my intent was enlightenment and I didn't expect a response from you, it can't be called "trolling". --JJLatWiki 02:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this is absolutely relevant to the debate, and I will restore it if removed again. ATren 05:40, 17 December 2006 (UTC)