Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Haffkine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Radiant thinks I'm making a point by unilaterally introducing a quorum policy. This is simply incorrect.

From Wikipedia:Guide_to_Votes_for_deletion: "[The limit on renomination ] does not apply if a VFD discussion had no consensus for a simple lack of interest (e.g. two or three votes total); those are sometimes relisted immediately, to draw people's attention to them." There is never any harm in letting a discussion continue of it has only attracted a very few votes. This is completely in keeping with the principle: When in doubt, don't delete. and the principle of consensus (three or four people isn't really much of a consensus; there is always time to wait for more votes). --Tony Sidaway^Talk 23:47, 27 August 2005 (UTC)