Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Furry love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Continued from the Project Page

  • Thanks for not helping the article everyone. I didn't do a good job even though I tried to, but a least someone a could have tried also. Deleting every bit of text you can and then replacing it all with yiff graphics helps none. Maybe one of you could stop deleting articles all day and actually try helping. WpediaIsNotPaper 00:14, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Many of us do actively contribute to articles or start completely new ones. However, there are legitimate reasons for deleting articles sometimes. The predominant opinion seems to be that this article is at best not notable enough for Wikipedia and at worst, a made up concept. Please understand that every "delete" vote is not a personal attack on you. If you wish to save this article, consider putting it on WikiFur. --kotra 01:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Actually, please don't put it on WikiFur. I don't think it would be any more useful there. This concept appears to be a personal one, not shared by other furries. Gentaur 16:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Wpedia, There isn't much that can be done. You said how the editors weren't helpful, maybe is a concept the people who edited doesn't share, nor was able to pinpoint. I mean, if is ever pinpoint-able. Furry Love doesn' seems any different than the good ol' love, seeing the old descriptions you did yourself. Non-notability comes not because is something inexistant -- it's not about two furs unable to find love. It's just because it's 'just love', and that's already covered.
Compare to when people were discussing if 'O RLY?' had any notability- they decided to keep it while important, and maybe delete when everyone forgets. And yiff -- which was kept because, well, it's a subculture on itself. Maybe you need to wait furry love cook up for a few years, and see if it'll become something distinct and clear enough to people be inspired in making more sensical articles. Till then, we wait. Kobayen 04:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)