The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to antiproton. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 11:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
I think antiproton is enough. Perhaps it could be a redirect, but I think it'is better to delete. Just the antiproton links there. -- Harp 11:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Unless somene explains to me the harm in doing so, redirect to Antiproton. PJM 12:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Redirect as suggested. --Ed (Edgar181) 15:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.