Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/mixedfolks

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:35, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] mixedfolks

Appears to be self-promotion/vanity. a website with a forum. Dunc|☺ 20:55, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Seems to be an ad. Intresting site, though. ConeyCyclone 21:43, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• keep very nice info Chubby Chicken 00:32, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah, the Plump Poultry strikes again.. Recently, Chubby Chicken, has done almost nothing but cast "keep" votes on VfD - many for clearly non-notable, even borderline speedy articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:20, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
    • Chubby wont gain anything by keeping this up. I would doubt he's even getting chicken feed for this charade. JamesBurns 04:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, by the way - non-notable website. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:21, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)
• Delete website advertising. JamesBurns 04:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - unless notability can be established beyond being yet another site for people to talk to one another. 3,000 Google hits, many of which are Wikimirrors. Mere forums are not of encyclopedic importance unless they've made some wider impact. --FCYTravis 06:33, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Why is this also listed under Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mixedfolks? -- Cyrius|✎ 03:27, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.