Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//proc/meminfo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Procfs. Daniel.Bryant [ T ยท C ] 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] /proc/meminfo

/proc/meminfo (edit|[[Talk::/proc/meminfo|talk]]|history|links|watch|logs)

Not notable. Doc aberdeen 09:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

  • (Note: I'm the creator of the /proc/meminfo article). Google lists 213,000 hits for "/proc/meminfo". I haven't used it much myself, but I'm under the impression that it's an important interface to know about when programming Linux utilities. I provided a link to a redhat explanation in the article. *Keep. -- Creidieki 22:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - this really seems to break the {{la}} template... --- RockMFR 22:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Why is this 1 paragraph of information all alone in a separate article, rather than in procfs, which contains an expansion request? Uncle G 00:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment -- the expansion request seems to be requesting that the specific section (which is the "supported under" section). But considering the current length of /proc/fs, and the fact that I don't care to write any more at the moment, I'd be happy to consent to a merge (at least until there's more material). I seem to be the only one to have made a substantive edit to the article -- does that mean we can do a speedy merge? -- Creidieki 03:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge - per Uncle G -- wtfunkymonkey 01:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Uncle G has the right idea. Merge. --Dennisthe2 02:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge & Redirect per the above. --Czj 07:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.