Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//pizza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 07:49, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] /pizza

A single command in Everquest 2. And haven't I read somewhere that pages with forward-slashes in their names are bad ideas? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• Hilarious, if true; if a source can be found, merge to either Everquest II or Product placement. (Names with slashes are not completely bad—/dev/null, for example—but don't behave quite the way you'd expect sometimes.) Kirill Lokshin 04:11, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't have a source, but it was in the news some time ago. --Halal 08:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Everquest II#Business already talks about it; I don't think a redirect is going to be useful here. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

  Would it hurt to have it, though? I doubt anyone will search for the command itself, but it's still possible. Kirill Lokshin 04:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• Kind of funny, actually. How about a merge? - Lucky 6.9 05:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: I don't mind the merge, but it's non-GFDL kosher to merge and delete, and I really can't imagine command line entries in article space (i.e. in the resulting redirect). Perhaps there should be a section Everquest 2#Easter eggs. Geogre 13:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No mergable content and pointless as a redirect. KingTT 18:25, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Already covered in Everquest II. (I'm hoping people would be smart enough to look up a game to find out about it if they can't find anything using the /pizza command). - Mgm|^(talk) 10:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with product placement if it's not already there. The mention at the Everquest article should stay, too. But this doesn't need its own article, though it's funny, and it seems an unlikely search term.Jacqui^★ 15:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, really nn.  Grue  17:38, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, subtrivial gamecruft. MCB 22:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.