Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"net entertainment"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete (A7) by Sr13 -- The Placebo Effect 13:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "net entertainment"
Article was speedy deleted using CSD A7 (corp/web). Article was then recreated by original author and then went through a failed PROD (somebody added a prod tag that was then removed by original author). Since this article went through a failed PROD I decided that tagging with a CSD template would be wrong, but I believe it definitely still fits under CSD A7. Speedy delete. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 17:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as per above Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 17:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete & SALT Clearly a non notable company that can be speedied under CSD A7. It should also be salted to prevent recreation. Clearly, the author cannot take a hint. --Cyrus Andiron 18:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and definitely don't forget the salt this time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete and add salt, perhaps pepper to taste. Fits the criteria. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 20:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as spam. DarkAudit 21:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The article doesn't provide any independent citations to demonstrate notability, but it does assert notability of a sort (software "used by over 40 well known online operators"), so I don't think it qualifies for speedy deletion. EALacey 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment an assertion of notability would preclude an A7 speedy, but other speedy criteria may still be applicable. Like spam. DarkAudit 21:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, non notable and meet WP:CSD#A7. Carlosguitar 22:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.