Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"crude humor cartoon"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Sceptre ^(Talk) 20:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] crude humor cartoon

Neologism, only 100 google quote search hits TxRx 03:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism, and doesn't even seem to be accurate either. (For example, Futurama's animation is very high quality owing to its use of computer animation.) —Psychonaut 05:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A)Does not following article naming conventions. B)Confusing, is crude modifying humor or cartoon? xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 05:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, Psychonaut -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 05:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Psychonaut and Xaosflux. Movementarian 08:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Rename or merge. Neologism is not a very good reason for considering this article for deletion. Perhaps it could use another title, or it could fit in an existing article about cartoons. - MB (Talk) 11:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above reasons. Dustimagic 20:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not for Neologism, but because it fails to make sense logically (with regard to the children issue) Theheadhunter 10:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I have moved the page to crude humor cartoon per naming conventions. The AFD link has been correct accordingly. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 10:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.