Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Thomas Jefferson Shadden"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Thomas Jefferson Shadden"

"Thomas Jefferson Shadden" (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It seems to be a work of fiction, has no references and is written in an entirely unencyclopedic manner. Localzuk(talk) 13:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. It appears to me to be a cut-and-paste from a contemporary biographical note. I still don't see anything there to indicate notability, even if rewritten in encyclopedic style. -- Bpmullins | Talk 15:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No evidence of notibility. No sources. No attempt to meet WP:V or WP:BIO. Since this may be a genuine historical person, open to reconsideration if sources and evidence of notibility are produced. --Shirahadasha 15:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Notability not claimed. Seems to be copyvio, but not off the web. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 20:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment There's a web version of it here. Ohconfucius 06:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment - it's not a copyvio since the presumed source is out of copyright. -- Bpmullins | Talk
  • Delete most likly copied from whatever source is stated at the top. Agree with the above points. SGGH 19:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete — per everyone else. Bushcarrot (Talk·Desk) 03:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete even if it's out of copyright, I still think it's bad form to copy and paste from another source. Ohconfucius 06:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.