Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"The Expendable One"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "The Expendable One"

"The Expendable One" (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Not a notable comic. Prod removed by anon. Danny Lilithborne 01:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep - appears to have sufficient sourcing to be brought up to standards under WP:NOTE, but unless someone is willing to do so, I wouldn't be choked about it being deleted. Needs a "Cleanup" tag, at the very least. --Haemo 02:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  Accepted argument, however which part of WP:NOTE are you indicating? — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete 'The Expendable one' + 'graphic novel' = 521ghits; no mention of why it is notable in the article itself. (Just in case I added cleanup & wikify tags). SkierRMH 03:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  Accepted. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep - I've never heard of it but it could be improved. Isn't this getting deleted a little quickly? Leah 10:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  Five days is enough time for expansion and providing sources. After looking up on Google, I don't see independent and reliable sources. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Week Keep - the publisher is notable, so the comic is notable IMO by proxy. It should stand to be cleaned up though. Just H 20:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  Not in accordance with any guideline. Rejected. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or merge into publisher's page. Pete Fenelon 23:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

  Merged. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable --- Safemariner 07:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

  Accepted. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.