Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Iris moment"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. — Nearly Headless Nick 10:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Iris moment"

"Iris moment" (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non-notable Internet neologism, no indication that this is notable or passes WP:NEO. Seraphimblade 02:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator; does not appear notable, and has no reliable sources. Yuser31415 03:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Only 150 ghits, fails defines WP:NEO. Caknuck 03:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Definitely non-notable neo. Fan-1967 03:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete cuz everything feels like the movies. JuJube 03:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • The policy that applies is actually Wikipedia:No original research. This article purports to document a fad. It cites no sources, and I can find no sources already documenting this fad. Wikipedia is not a primary source. It is not the place for documenting the never-before-documented. Delete. Uncle G 03:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and I can find no reliable secondary sources for the etymology given, since this appears to be a non-notable neologism, so this isn't verifiable, and constitutes original research. I think that sums up every argument, yes? --Sopoforic 05:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 06:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hardly a significant cultural phenomenon even within the limited context of what's new on youtube this month, has no reason to treat it is notable.zadignose 10:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, I love the song - it sits proudly near the top of my iTunes playlist - but this is a totally non-notable neologism. Lacks reliable sources to meet WP:V. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 10:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. 1ne 10:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.