Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/\ماشین سوزن

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 00:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] \ماشین سوزن

\ماشین سوزن (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nonsense Gfzh 15:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, expired translation request with no apparent interest in salvaging it. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 15:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Terribly Arabic. Delete per nom. Bigtop 16:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• USERFY somewhere and Delete - I do not think foreign language articles should be allowed to stay "up" while translation requests are being processed. Corpx 18:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'm almost certain this is Persian. The title says "Point machine or point lock". Look at the creator's other edits to see where his interests lie. The link directs to a German company which makes rail points. Possible WP:COI. I doubt if there's anything worth translating here. --Folantin 18:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete How can we possibly know that it's not libelous until someone who knows Arabic or Persian reviews it? (Both languages use just about the same alphabet/script, don't they?) It could be anything, including gibberish. Isn't there some kind of speedy-delete rule about non-English postings? Noroton 21:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

  There was. Now, it's only speedy if it's already in another Wikipedia's language, apparently. --UsaSatsui 04:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete needs translation, but it is possible to contain WP:OR. Carlosguitar 21:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Harlowraman 13:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Hey, when did criteria A-2 change, anyways? --UsaSatsui 04:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• COMMENT This article is up for translation and if anyone took the time to read the box on the article's page, you would see that any article that has not been translated in two weeks is up for deletion. Considering it has not been two weeks yet (it is closer to a week), then I think this discussion is premature. Postcard Cathy 12:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

This article is in Persian. It contains a few short definitions of terms related to rail points plus an external link to a manufacturer of said points. There is nothing here of any value to translate. --Folantin 12:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Folantin. It says it will be listed for deletion if not translated in two weeks; it doesn't say it can't be listed earlier. --Coppertwig 20:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - articles in Arabic script have no place in the English-language WP. Alternatively, transfer it to its own language WP. I not ethe two following items were speedy-ed. I think my vote should be Speedy delete for this too. Peterkingiron 18:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.