Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuo Ci

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Postdlf 04:26, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zuo Ci

Delete As written, this give no sign of notability, or even that it is a myth. I can't search anything in Mandarin or Cantonese where there might be more information, but I can't find anything in English Icelight 18:11, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like a hoax. Gwk 18:13, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: The references to Lord Cao Cao make it sound like something from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. I'm not familiar enough with that story to tell whether this is really part of it, though. — Gwalla | Talk 21:24, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
• Doesn't anyone use google any more? Kappa 01:10, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. What Kappa means is that this 'person' is verified in the first few Google hits. I expect Kappa also meant to suggest this link which appears to be a translation or similar from the text mentioned in the article. -Splash 02:09, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Kappa and Splash. Pburka 03:26, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete borderline notable at best. JamesBurns 05:10, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Verifiable legend Sam Vimes 15:24, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, per Kappa and Splash, and Pburka. --BD2412
• Keep Definitely real character in Romance of the Three Kingdoms heres his appearance in the novel
• Keep I've corrected all the blaring errors in that article, and also added a lot of detail, don't delete it now --Applepurple
• Keep God knows why it's up for deletion in the first place, Zuo Ci was a character in Romance of the Three Kingdoms and is just as valid as Zhou Cang, Diao Chan and anyone else who's existance is suspicious in the real world --Tiresais
• Cleanup. Stream of consciousness, almost unreadable (maybe author not native speaker?). --Trovatore 06:26, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.