Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubbles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 14:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zubbles

Zubbles (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)This is a spam article about a nonnotable commercial product. It reads like an ad.--Fashionslide 04:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy keep; This article links to an eleven page article about Zubbles in Popular Science (the same, highly respected Popular Science that's been published for over 130 years). This doesn't just meet WP:N requirements, it exceeds them. Masaruemoto 04:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep If the article reads like spam, its a clean-up issue not a delete issue. The popular science reference CLEARLY establishes notability. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and Merge Tim Kehoe and Ram Sabnis into this article. Torc2 05:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Masaruemoto. Maxamegalon2000 05:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep media coverage includes WaPo, reader's digest and der Spiegel--victor falk 10:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Clearly notable, per the reliable secondary sources mentioned in the article. —gorgan_almighty 14:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.