Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zooomr (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 16:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zooomr

Zooomr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is clearly spam created by the Zooomr team to advertise their product which has little recognition and serves to bolster the reputation of its unknown founder. This article should be deleted immediately. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rangers2032 (talk • contribs).

— Rangers2032 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep, article appears to be appropriately documented. Brasscat 08:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, sources on article have not been shown to be wrong. Djackmanson 06:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, numerous results on current Google News, red-link nominator. Coverage in wired, CNBC, MSN, CNET, etc. etc. --Dhartung | Talk 08:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, article is obvious spam. The article is self-aggrandizing and the coverage is mostly of Thomas Hawk, not Zooomr.--AnimenManga | Talk 18:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

— AnimenManga (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Speedy keep, article has plenty of reliable sources and doesn't seem spammy to me. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 18:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep has reliable sources. OysterGuitarst 22:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep describes the site as it should. if you don't like it then fix it, don't delete it. --65.95.156.62 06:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. Nominator seems like a sockpuppet. --Matt 20:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as per above, verifiable sources, notable, although I use a competitor's service. Bearian 00:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.