Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoomerang.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — Scientizzle 15:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoomerang.com

Zoomerang.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, and WP:SPAM. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Zoomerang.com. Hu12 21:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete --Hu12 22:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)changed to abstain Hu12 05:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Why? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Nevermind, I realize you're the nominator. You did give a reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as spam (G11), so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, has been cleaned up some but still looks a bit spammy. Seems to pass WP:CORP at least now, with some decent sources. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 04:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment, you forgot to put the AfD tag on the article itself. I fixed that. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 22:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Oops, thanks for fixing that.--Hu12 22:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep but clean up/remove all non-neutral info. This company is popular among small businesses, schools, non-profits, etc. that need to run online marketing surveys on the cheap. The company gets reported on a lot in trade journals in articles about how to do market research. Crypticfirefly 02:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I've cleared out some of the dross, added a few references in addition to the company's own website. Crypticfirefly 03:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.