Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoo pals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:50, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zoo pals

Google verifies that these exist, so its not nonsense, but it is non-notable CunningLinguist 01:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete non notable. JamesBurns 06:17, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete it is way to usless. Unless someone cares to research these some more. --harrismw 06:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'd say make it a stub and let someone expand it. Maybe, in 10 years, this will be a defining article of several people's childhoods. There's an article on Dixie Cups. Jasonglchu 14:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is just one product from a large company (maufacturer of Hefty trash bags. I don't see that the product is notable by itself. - DS1953 16:28, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment. I'd agree, except I'd like to know why the user bothered making the entry. Jasonglchu 17:12, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Good question, since nothing links there. Still not notable, IMO. DS1953 19:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. What's non-notable to you isn't necessarily non-notable to others. Ketsuban (is 1337) 19:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - absolutely uninformative. Pavel Vozenilek 19:38, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • At the moment, yes. It's not going to blossom into a Featured Article candidate overnight, you know. Ketsuban (is 1337) 19:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chameleon (talk • contribs) 20:11, 8 Jun 2005

  • Delete as a non-notable product, or advertising. --InShaneee 21:59, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable. --FCYTravis 22:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as uninformative. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:40, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as of current state, it is completely useless. It could become famous and there could be a great stub started for it... but right now, unless someone cares to fix it, it must go. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 06:33, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.