Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zonino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zonino

Zonino (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

UD and vanity sources. Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 03:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as neologism. Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source, The Zonino site is hype in search of substance. Even if it were notable, wiktionary would be the place for it. - Richfife 03:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism. Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. DarkAudit 03:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neologism; we are not a dictionary. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 03:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to be an attempt to create a word by using Wikipedia, which makes it advertising in a way. --Charlene 04:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a dictionary. -- MightyWarrior 11:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. As I have said previously, 90% of neologism articles should be shot on sight. As DarkAudit has correctly pointed out Wikipedia is not urban dictionary. ---Cathal 15:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. Listing a "source" of Urbandictionary is a sure sign that something belongs in the rubbish bin. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Per WP:NEO. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 23:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nn neologism. Man, what is this, the feast day of Urban-Dictionary-related AfD's? Ford MF 07:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.