Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zompist Bboard

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to zompist.com. [[smoddy]] 19:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zompist Bboard

The article's about a board that has 856 members. 651 have posted more than once. - Home Row Keysplurge 16:27, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

All Keeps as of 09:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC) have been by board members ([1][2][3][4]) - Home Row Keysplurge 09:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

So? Dewrad 01:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. may be notable soon, maybe not. --Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 16:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 16:36:27, 2005-08-24 (UTC)
• Merge with zompist.com.DS 19:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep' we have an article on the Conlang list, why not one on the ZBB? Both are pretty famous within the conlanging community. Dewrad 21:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per DS. JDoorjam 21:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with zompist.com and/or Mark Rosenfelder (which should probably both be one page anyway). Penelope D 21:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As Dewrad said, this board is now probably a bigger community than the conlang list, and it is Hypocracy to have one and not the other. More than that, the group as a whole has a large group of amature linguists on it, as well as several authors attempting to get published. Deserves to stay for that reason. Warmaster 23:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep As Dewrad and Warmaster said, the board is big enough to be recognized by the greater conlanging community. Ink Pudding 00:31, 26 August 25 Edit by User:172.197.84.194.
• Merge with Zompist.com. P'raps in the future the zbb will merit its own page, but not quite yet. Adso de Fimnu
• Keep As others have said, the ZBB is very well-known in the conlanging community. For this reason, and the others mentioned above, this article should stay. Xeon 03:50, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.