Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie and mummy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Zombie and mummy
Claims to be a "significant piece of artwork"; however, the artist doesn't have a page, and none of the sources seem to meet WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Curse - per WP:NFT; from the talk page, "THIS ARTICLE is for our class project so please do not delete page!" Even though the topic is not made up, the article is, and the class project does not currently conform to notability and WP:RS standards. ◄Zahakiel► 19:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and salting might be in order RogueNinjatalk 22:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Comment - The artist does actually have a page (Olia Lialina) - interesting images. Guest9999 (talk) 00:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. This isn't the place for class projects. I've also flagged Olia Lialina for notability too. (Emperor (talk) 03:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC))
- Delete. I followed the links and looked at a couple of the cartoons. They are distinctly non-notable. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
what do you mean when you say salt —Preceding unsigned comment added by L.graham21 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- "Salt" means that the topic cannot be re-created without administrative permission. It indicates that not only is the topic not notable, but it is not likely to become so in the immediate future, so it is prevented from being re-created until a persuasive argument can be made that it is suitable for inclusion. ◄Zahakiel► 20:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.