Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoltán Dani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to F-117 Nighthawk#Combat loss. Apart from a (unsourced, hence not merged) line about owning a pastry shop, this is not about the person, but about the shootdown, and duplicates information at the target location. If he ever gets notable for anything else, he can have an article again. Sandstein 05:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoltán Dani

Zoltán Dani (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. There are millions of people who did impressive things during a war, and most of them are not notable enough to be in an encyclopedia. Edrigu 15:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions. -- Carom 17:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • keep -- and some of the million are notable enough. his accomplishment seems very distinctive, as a unique accomplishment against a very much more sophisticated enemy. The USA today article is sufficient documentation. DGG 08:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
But is it really his accomplishment? I think it's the accomplishment of his unit, he just happened to be commanding it. Edrigu 15:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep — I agree that the role Dani has played is distinctive. It is possible to justify, though, merger of this biographical article into the section F-117_Nighthawk#Combat_losses because the only notability the person has is apparently in relation to this military aircraft. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per Ceyockey Thewinchester (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.