Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zofia Kulik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 13:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zofia Kulik

Zofia Kulik (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  08:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Procedural nomination. There's no direct assertion of notability and there are other ongoing AFD debates about Polish contemporary artists, so I've deprodded this article and brought it here. I'll say I'm neutral. Mereda 13:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- Mereda 13:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I'm not sure if shes the subject of multiple, non-trivial works, but I did find [1] and a critical analysis of some of her art [2]. Those are just English though and there are many more ghits when not searching for English only. Perhaps someone who speaks Polish would be better able to prove notability. James086^Talk 13:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - The article needs work for the English version of wikipedia, especially if their are so few English language references, but the artist was in the Venice Biennial, so that's some notability right there. Freshacconci 14:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment:As I've argued before, inclusion in the Biennal is an assertion of notability, but as usual that needs to be documented. -- BPMullins | Talk 14:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Which is why the article needs work. I think we should take it as good faith that the artist was at the Biennale and that this can be referenced, which would require someone to do the (most likely Polish language) research. Freshacconci 14:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems notable per the website; this is not adequately shown in the article yet. Johnbod 15:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment culture.pl usually lists notable artists, but this stub currently makes no refs on notability... -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  01:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• I don't understand that at all. What is culture.pl? Besides which, no one source is the ultimate arbiter. Tyrenius 05:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

He is saying the same as me just above; it is the website, which makes a much better account of notability than the article does. Johnbod 05:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Info There's also a generic discussion on artist notability that started Feb 14. --Mereda 16:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Multiple sources now on the article demonstrate WP:V and WP:N. John Vandenberg 21:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Now that I've inserted inline citation for Venice Biennale! Tyrenius 05:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.