Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zinc economy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 00:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zinc Economy

This has previously been a No consensus AFD in March 06. changes since Since the AFD there have been no new references or external links added. None of the current links on the page mention "zinc economy". From what I see on the relevent google hits this is a neologism with most useful hits being forums.--BirgitteSB 21:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Could use better sourcing, but a Google search demonstrates the concept's currency in discussions of future energy economies. Ford MF 09:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Which ghits do you think come from a third-party source other than a forum or a WP mirror?DGG 02:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Term is not notable, at least yet. I couldn't find any reliable sources about it (i.e., books or scientific journal articles). --Itub 13:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is clearly original research. Indrian 20:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.