Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Speak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was d313t3. Mailer Diablo 01:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zero Speak

NN internet language. Essentially fancy leet, article makes no claim to notaility. Seems more like vanity than anything else -- Dragoonmac - ^{If there was a problem y}_{o I'll solve it} 00:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete This page doesn't seem to be notable. However, wikipedia excels at all things internet. The page may yet improve and be useful to those who hear of the concept.--Chaser 00:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete most certainly NOT leetspeak, as this is randomcrapcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Perhaps a merge to leet is in order? It clearly is a derivative, and if it is somewhat notable, that's the better place for it then a delete. --Lakhim 01:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Merging to leet would be good Zoan 9:05, 10 May 2006
• Delete and maybe merge. Apparent vanispamcruftisement. Morgan Wick 02:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete' "Zero isn't very widespread. It emerged somewhere around in 2005 and in 2006 has gained little popularity...".  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable cruft -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 04:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable invented language, I can't see how this is any different from 1337sp33k. JIP | Talk 08:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 12:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete obviously. Any article which starts off by telling us how the origins of some new form of supposed speech cannot be traced is already well off the cruft-o-meter. Just zis Guy you know? 15:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or give it a line at leet, seems like a few highschoolers who want to outdo leetspeak. Lundse 17:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• {)|[[_|[7|[ or in english Delete This is 100% grade A number one CRAP Aeon 22:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pile on - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:10, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete please. quickly. make the bad article go away. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.