The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per nom as dicdef. RGTraynor 20:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete as neologism and attempt to redefine zero with an Urban Dictionary-type definition. --Elkman - (talk) 03:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nominator and Elkman. –Sommers(Talk) 11:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete as poor attempt to coin a neologistic meaning of a word. Stifle (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.