Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZeroLogic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 02:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ZeroLogic

Non-notable "e-sports team" (clan). -- Longhair 05:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}
  • Delete -- Longhair 05:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The team is a pillar of the American Call of Duty competetive scene, which is 2nd only to Counter Strike in size. Also, when it's a publicly run resource, what is the limit to information? None.

  • Leave -- Danyak501 12:24, 30 May 2006
  • Delete Classic example of teenage gamers thinking they're far more notable than they are. Would be different if they were significantly recognised and famous professionals (there's a justifiable place on WP for people like Thresh, say), but they describe themselves as "professional" despite playing in an amateur league. Seems therefore to completely fail notability guidelines. Seb Patrick 08:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete burninate this crap. Danny Lilithborne 10:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. So, that's what those vanity pages look like... --UsaSatsui 11:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Loath as I am to spoil young persons' fun, this is a clear delete. Vizjim 11:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Leave I think with the amount of work that has gone to this, the article should be left. There are other pages like this from other "clans" from this same CAL league the article describes. I don't see why an inter-connected network of relevant material should be shunned. textymann 10:59, 30 May 2006
  • Note First and only edit from new user. Fan1967 14:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Gaming clan = not notable. Take it to myspace. Fan1967 14:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • DELETE ALL CLANS! -- Kicking222 17:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Leave -- The team is a very noted group of individuals from a community that has thousands of members. The team currently competes for cash prizes making them by definition a professional team. Kaybee55 30 May 2006
  • Note First and only edit from new user. Zzzzz 21:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete doesnt meet notability requriement for electronic sports team i.e. hasnt won any major tournament. Zzzzz 21:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Leave Is there like a max space for wikipedia articles or something?? Why do you people really care so much? How is it affecting you in any sort of negative way besides perhaps being a little on the irelevant side to YOUR life. It's about building a massive network of information that people may at some point want to access. If it helps 1 or 2 people then hasn't it done its job??? CHILL PILL sambramann 05:10, 30 May 2006
  • Note Yet another first and only edit from new user. Fan1967 00:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Not quite...WP:NOT makes for some good reading. WP:VAIN and WP:WEB also apply here too. "How is it affecting anyone?" isn't really a relevant argument. Wikipedia is a specific project with specific goals, and this page does not fit within the criteria. --UsaSatsui 22:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Another clan was undeleted today, but apparently they were among the best ever in their field (as evidenced by a ton of international awards they'd won that were listed.) I see no such assertion here. If someone wants this info, we can userfy it. Grandmasterka 01:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.