Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenome

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 20:57, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zenome

Does not seem to be notable to me. Weak Delete. Google test 390 hits, Alexa test 155,425 rank. --cesarb 05:46, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like an advert to me. I get 547 English language hits for Zenome, and a number of these do appear to be unrelated, which would appear a rather low number for a web search directory, strongly suggesting it is not widely used. Average Earthman 09:37, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Waste o space. --Woohookitty 03:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Wikipedia ain't paper, but this sucks—Trevor Caira 12:19, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It is no more an 'advert' than the inclusion of Google. If the criteria for inclsuion is how popular a page is then the whole wiki project will grow to do little more than perpetuate the popular. The glory of Wiki is to allow the newcomers a tiny voice in the sea of sites judged virtually exclusively by its PageRank.

Unsigned comment by 65.93.1.143 (talk · contributions)

The criteria is not popularity, it's importance. --cesarb 01:23, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.