Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenapse

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:54, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Zenapse

• del. Yeah, please delete this. its embarrassing. I was drunk...etc..etc. sorry for the spam (stephen@blackroses.com zenapse.org)
• del. neologism. Mikkalai 05:25, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete concur. article appears to be an advert for author's blog. Unless proven otherwise, deletion is the best recourse. Fernando Rizo 05:28, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, blogger promo. Megan1967 08:00, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism is my call. "Zenapse is a fabricated word" says it all. Zzyzx11 09:23, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, self-promotion. jni 14:26, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What they said. --Phil | Talk 12:14, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ditto. Not to mention that "snowballing inertia" is a direct contradiction in terms! Grutness|^hello? 09:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.