Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zen Nihilism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zen Nihilism

An article on this subject would be useful to have, but I suspect this isn't it and isn't cleanable into becoming it, although I'd be happy to be proved wrong. Was tagged for a speedy delete but nominator unsure either, so it comes here for the community to discuss. No opinion from me.➨ ЯЄDVERS 20:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Not encyclopedic in tone or content; not a single citation, discussion of origin, usage etc. In fact, the last couple of paragraphs are plain creepy. In the immortal words - "rip it up and start again" Ac@osr 20:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Content of the article is a rant, not wikified, no need to keep an entry just because the title may have merits. Equendil 20:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia articles are never written in the first person. B.Wind 21:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism, WP:NOR. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 00:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wow... Read that last line! There's some serious sh*t here! Anyways, it's unsalvageable. Just get rid of it. Grandmasterka 03:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.