Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelda's Secret Ocarina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Regarding the "don't delete" vote, see WP:WEB for guidelines, gaming websites, like others, usually need to be large or significant in some other way to be considered a valid topic. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zelda's Secret Ocarina

No evidence of meeting WP:WEB website verifiability/inclusion guidelines. --W.marsh 21:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Alexa rank 440,561. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, I added some vertification? What else do you need? --HarroSIN 21:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Some proof that the site approaches the numbers set forth in WP:WEB, or at least some notable "accomplishments" or "controversies" that are not more suitably covered in some other articles. Take the arwing hack, for example - it's already covered in Arwing article in much better form. Do we really need a "these people did it" article? That's not right form, in my opinion. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 02:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Section/footnote/externallink-worthy in some larger articles, but certainly not worthy of an article of its own - few game websites generally are. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 02:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as barely notable website. Stifle 00:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:WEB. incog 18:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete, meaning if you delete this page due to it being a "gaming website", you'll have to take other entries (GameFAQs, GameSpot, GameSPY, ect...) with it (if they are also "gaming websites", like it says in their descriptions. I think you people should get your facts straight first).--HarroSIN 03:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.