Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zedstar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 14:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zedstar

Zedstar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Self promotional article failing WP:COI. Perhaps not a speedy A7 but no references, major assertion of notability - Fails WP:BIO Peripitus (Talk) 12:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - indicating that someone is a popstar isn't a meaningful assertion of importance. Addhoc 12:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Pure self-praising crap. Not particularly well written either... "14teen" and "16teen" - show that perhaps the author doesn't have a full grasp of English. Scarian^Talk 12:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - I don't think that any person familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines would (could?) argue for the preservation of this article. It is clear that this individual is not {yet?} notable. This article seems more a vehicle to achieve notability.--C.Logan 13:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes and now tagged as such - I was clearly not awake when I decided not the tag it for A7 at the beginning - Peripitus (Talk) 13:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - it looks like something that belongs in the sandbox!! Jake the Editor Man 13:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.