Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaspa-Młyniec

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Close. No need to waste time on this. —Xezbeth 11:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zaspa-Młyniec

Zaspa-Młyniec (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable town Sploooshman 09:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. Another in a spree of strange AFD nominations by Splooshman. Real towns and major sections of cities is something I would expect a comprehensive encylopedia to cover. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
While cities and large towns are notable and deserving to be recognised in a comprehensive encyclopedia, smaller townships and villages with no historical, cultural, social or other significance are not. As this town has no past or present achievements or any form of notoriety it does not pass notability guidelines and until it reaches these its deletion and the discussion of its deletion is justified Sploooshman 09:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
So presumably if this debate goes against you then you'll accept the consensus about the notability of towns and villages in future? 124.183.234.246 10:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. That's much larger than the village of 603 inhabitants you nominated for deletion, and even that I said should be kept because villages and towns are notable regardless of size.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 10:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep It's a real place, it's notable, these are silly nominations. Nick mallory 10:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Although not a guideline or policy, consensus has been in the past that cities, villages, and towns are all sufficiently notable. --Dhartung | Talk 10:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.