Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zanic, Bernard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zanic, Bernard
Autobiographical vanity article by processing engineer from Australian winemaker. 5 unique Ghits, can't find anything to verify the claims made in the article, which don't look particularly significant anyway. Oldelpaso 11:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Contributor is Bzanic which obviously lends itself to WP:VAIN. I get only three Ghits, which lends itself to non-notability. One of the three hits is a note written by Zanic to confirm a subscription. The other two go to an Australian agency called CSIRO, and it's here that I find factual problems. The article states Zanic implemented improvements to the Australian wine industry as a whole. The CSIRO website indicates that agency provided algorithms and processes to Zanic, which he is very pleased by. Zanic's testimonial here also states that production improvements occurred for the Southcorp winery, identifies Zanic as a Southcorp employee, and shows no indication of any industry-wide improvements in wine production. In the article, Zanic takes credit for industry-wide implementation of the Toyota Production System/Lean Manufacturing System. I would be willing to entertain the notion that an industry-wide production improvement would be notable, but I would need far better sourcing and citations to credit this to Zanic. Tychocat 08:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Nowhere near WP:BIO, also cites no sources and is unverifiable. --Wine Guy Talk 20:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.