Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zane (hairstylist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zane (hairstylist)

Zane (hairstylist) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only reference appears to be a single, human interest interview. Article full of trivia, and notability barely asserted (just enough that I wouldn't put it up for CSD). — Coren (talk) 05:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Clearly fails to establish notability other than being an 18-year-old hair stylist. Only hair stylists of recognition for their abilities would be notable - neither the article nor a quick google search suggest any recognition. --Mkativerata 05:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO and WP:V. Being "most known for his presence in wildly diverse social circles" or owning a few salons isn't much of a claim of notability, even if it's true. Like Mkativerata, I was unable to uncover any additional information on this person or his salons via a Google search. --Bongwarrior 06:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment WikiProject Fashion has been apprised of this AFD in lieu of a DelSort option. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Promo without any real assertion of notability (innovative stylings, product line, prominent clients would all help, but I have a feeling we've seen what we're going to see). Daniel Case 15:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:N. --Sc straker 01:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I do not have enough experience as a wikipedia user and there is not enough information or references on the article from external sources. I agree that the article does fail WP:N and I understand why it is an AFD.--D4rkljcv73 04:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.