Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zahra Amir Ebrahimi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Eluchil404 08:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Zahra Amir Ebrahimi
Fails WP:BIO, and sole event that wikipedia lists in her life already has an article of its own at Iranian sex tape scandal. Thethinredline 16:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - She's one of the best known actresses in Iran. [1] . And this scandal has made her extremely notable outside of Iran now. [2][3][4] --Oakshade 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep since she is a popular actress she clearly merits an article, but if the article now only lists the scandal perhaps it should be stubbed rather than deleted. Also the article Iranian sex tape scandal would be left dangling strangly unattached on its own without an article on the main character. Rune X2 01:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep well known, and subject of international news KnightLago 04:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep notable actress in Iran, now well known internationally. Gail Wynand 05:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletions. -- ⇒ bsnowball 09:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, sources are cited, and a well known Iranian actress, makes her very popular after the scandal. Terence Ong 11:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Rune. Poor girl. Stammer 12:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, and support a possible stubbing, as per Rune. Ford MF 15:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, and maybe add more than the sex tape scandal.Klymen 10:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Not complete by any means. Stub. JavaWarlord 20:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, but I think the Iranian sex tape scandal should be merged into the article.--MaGioZal 00:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.