Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zadok Inc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zadok Inc

ATTENTION! If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks). You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing! Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}.

A truly hideuous article about a website which offers no credible evidence of meeting WP:WEB, deleted (but not by AfD) and re-created, so strictly a contested deletion and needs AfD. Although to be honest I was tempted just to be a bit WP:ROUGE and nuke the sucker. Guy 22:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - no hope of meeting WP:WEB. Valrith 22:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. VegaDark 22:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete its a good article and has good content (BTW it was orignally deleted when it had 3 words and i was typing)Evilflip 00:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Evilflip (talk • contribs) 04:52, 9 September 2006
• Delete per nom. Unless they agree to make me a mod on their forums, in which case, expand. My Alt Account 06:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's a bad article and has no content. Danny Lilithborne 00:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete It's up for improvement, i say he has the room to improve it under the sole pretenses that no one else will want the section Zadok Inc, and therefore gives him the right to it until a more popular candidate requests it. Soda-Sama 18:43, 10 September 2006 (CST)

• Note: Previous vote was signed with an invalid user name by 68.63.39.115 (talk · contribs)

• Don't Delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.218.214 (talk • contribs)
• Its an alright article, could use some TLC but just give it a while. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingleboy (talk • contribs)
• Don't Delete It is part of the worlds history and IT is a website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.207.140 (talk • contribs)
• Don't Delete the web sites ok and the article needs some work, but this could be a great article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.252.163 (talk • contribs)
• Don't Delete Contains suitable material and is subject to improvement. Could be great, let it live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.23.143 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 00:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Ogdred 03:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.