Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect; as a former KoL player, I know there's nothing to be merged. Johnleemk | Talk 06:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zach Johnson

Was nominated for speedy deletion, but I have an inkling that Jick may be notable. No opinion. - EurekaLott 05:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. His website appears to be notable. Rory096 07:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & redirect with his website. StarryEyes 11:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & redirect as per StarryEyes. A lot of the contributions for the "Kingdom of Loathing" and related articles seem to come from User:Xym, which is almost Xym's only contributions. I'm assuming good faith (which is why not delete), but it smells like a self-promotion, and more importantly do we really need 3, 4, + stub pages regarding one website that is only in the top 11,000 per Alexia? —akghetto ^talk 16:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as he is not notable. If anyone cares to, merge any applicable content to the apparent article about his website (which doesn't seem to be all that notable IMO, but that is a separate discussion).--Isotope23 20:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• No Opinion I am not affiliated with KoL in any way except as a player. I wasn't really even serious about this page as I was just doing it as something minor to screw around with to try making a page. If people would like to remove it, it's fine with me. Xym 06:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.