Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac Corker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Grandmasterka 03:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Zac Corker

Reason the page should be deleted

The amount of verifiable information in this entry is so small that it does not merit its own page. The entirety of the verifiable information is encapsulated within the single Harvard Gazette link given at the bottom, which should be instead placed on the fun czar page. Speedyeric 03:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:BIO. I'd say trash fun czar as well. Full disclosure: I went to Yale. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:BIO. A university employee at this level is non-notable. --Metropolitan90 04:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I agree with Kinu that fun czar should go, too. -- Gogo Dodo 04:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination, and yes, fun czar as well. I'll put that up for AfD. -- Captain Disdain 05:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. University administrators are not notable. Mr Stephen 11:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:BIO. Scorpiondollprincess 13:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 17:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above. SynergeticMaggot 18:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my own nomination Speedyeric 20:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Why can't be speedy crap like this? DELETE AND QUICKLY!!!!! Antares33712 18:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.