Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zabala vineyards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as advertising. - Philippe 02:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Zabala vineyards

Zabala vineyards (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Written more or less like an advertisement. I was unable significant coverage from third party sources and seriously doubt that any such coverage exists. It only makes sense to keep articles about specific vineyards if it has a sufficiently rich history or a place among the world or the region's most celebrated producers. This one fails on both counts. Perhaps a redirect to the wine-region is an option. Pichpich (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete-Yes, the article is very biased. And, without the proper sources, I think it ought to be deleted. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom; it reads like an advert and doesn't assert notability in any way. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 14:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.