Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZGMF-X09A Justice Gundam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 07:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ZGMF-X09A Justice Gundam

Total fancruft of no general interest, part of a large walled garden. Brian G. Crawford 22:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep While I don't like SEED much, it's worth to keep. No general interest? Gundam is consider to be largest mecha franchise in Japan. Delete these article would be like delete all Star Wars's article like AT-AT, AT-ST and AT-PT(and there are TWO wiki web for Star Wars already as well). Not that I don't like Star Wars, but Japaneese anime is a form of art too. If mecha and spaceship from American's sci-fi movie can be include here in Wikipedia, why mecha from Japaneese sci-fi anime can't? L-Zwei 06:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep If these articles are deleted you would have to delete about every single anime character plus Star Wars and Star Trek articles. - Plau 11:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. Just because you personally have no interest in a subject doesn't mean there's "no general interest". Note BTW that "ZGMF-X09A Justice Gundam" gets 1,160 Google hits. Redxiv 18:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • And just "Justice Gundam" gets 53,700 hits. Redxiv 06:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• keep please what do you mean large walled garden Yuckfoo 18:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It's his term for a bunch of related articles that he's decided should be deleted because he's personally uninterested in the subject. Redxiv 19:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment the term "walled garden" refers to a group of articles that lend each other legitimacy by linking to each other. For instance, if someone wrote an article about a nn little league team, it would look bogus as none of the people in it would have articles. But if all those articles were created, it would look more legitimate. Mangojuice 19:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this article doesn't explain the importance of this particular robot to the series, and the article has no sources. Mangojuice 19:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, if the article is insufficient in explaining some things, fix it. Don't delete it. Space Pirate Minagi 22:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep: I agree with the comment above. Adv193 01:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. If anything, you're being too specific with your delete requests... By that logic, you'd have to delete every Gundam article on Wikipedia, along with most other Anime articles - in fact, there are several more obscure series that should have been targeted first. And I'm not in favor of that - I enjoy having the information on this and other series all available in one place. Furthermore, varying amounts of data on the subject (Gundam) are found on the Japanese, French, Spanish, Italian, and German Wikipedias shows, in my opinion, that at least the general subject deserves coverage here. Golux Ex Machina 06:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: This is fancruft not even about a major character. Wikipedia's Minor Character policy stipulates stuff like this is meant to be collected on one page. A Mech is not a character it is a vehicle used by character in an Anime. Please be objective here and read teh wikipedia policies. The article is source less and is essentially fancruft. --206.191.28.13 15:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRUFT and WP:FICT. Stifle (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it! I use this article sometimes to help out with various online forums and games. Taking if off with no good reason other than you don't like it is not a good reason. And since it is obvious that you don't like it the series, then you must not know the Justice was piloted by the second protagonist in the series. Therefore, it is important to keep it around. Revan Vrake
• Strong Keep MarineCorps 23:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.