This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 12:47, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete Agree with Zzyzx11. Johntex 02:23, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, geneaology, article as it stands is un-encycloapedic. Megan1967 02:30, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I'm sure it's not "foreign" in whatever country it comes from, but this isn't encyclopedia-worthy. – Beginning 02:37, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.