Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yppotryl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Khaosworks (nonsense) --cesarb 02:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Yppotryl
Zero hits for "Yppotryl "Oakley County". All 12 hits for Yppotryl are at "Cryptozoology" sites. No relevant hits for Yppotryl remains found. From same IP as Devil dog above. Niteowlneils 04:53, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- A joke article. See Ypotryll for the real thing. Apparently, this was deleted once before? (see previous comment's date) Delete. Emiao 03:11, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedied. --khaosworks 03:17, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Blast away at the orphaned talk page, if you would be so kind. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:24, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Done. --khaosworks 03:28, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Blast away at the orphaned talk page, if you would be so kind. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:24, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Couldn't this be redirected to Ypotryll to avoid recreation? Mgm|(talk) 11:36, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- ... especially as there's now a dangling hyperlink in cryptozoology that someone will otherwise eventually try to fill in (again). I agree with MacGyverMagic. Redirect mis-spelling that people have actually made in creating articles. In fact, as the prior article has been deleted, I've been bold. Uncle G 15:32, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.