Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yozons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca 00:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yozons

Yozons (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I speedied this under CSD G11 given the borderline promotional text and the conflict of interest seen in the article creator's name (Yozons). After protest, and an attack, I think there will be less drama if this goes through AfD and the community decides. The company returns 185 unique Google hits, 11 websites link to Yozons', no Google news results and the company's website ranks at 1,035,409 per Alexa. Though I didn't scour the web results at great length, I didn't see any in depth coverage in independent and reliable sources. This does not appear to meet WP:CORP. Personally, I think WP:COI should have teeth. That conversation cannot be given a proper airing here, but I do find articles created in this manner offensive and antithetical to our aims.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Clearly non notable. Agree with you, seems to meet G11. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I think you were correct to delete it under G11 in the first place. Happy to provide you with a consensus stick to back you up though. Lankiveil (talk) 07:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC).
• delete make it 3Balloonman (talk) 08:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Blatant ad. Worth the speedy. Hammer1980·^talk 11:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.