Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth revival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 22:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Youth revival

• Delete - unencyclopaedic nonsense Xorkl000 04:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Revival meeting. Reasonable search term, big enough phenomenon it could someday have its own article. --Allen 06:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and improve. Google has 16100 hits, and it appears to be a large movement (unless all those are about CPR). Granted, in its current state it's really bad, but surely someone can fix it. --Rory096 06:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --Terence Ong 08:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite. Not the same thing as a revival meeting, common phenomenon in evangelical Christian youth groups. Current article is written in the type of jargon commonly used by members of such groups and is badly in need of rewriting by someone with more distance. - AdelaMae ^{(talk - contribs)} 08:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me}08:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Changing my vote to keep and rewrite as per AdelaMa's comment above --Xorkl000 09:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but, please, somebody write it over from scratch. Logophile 11:16, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and/or start from scratch. Paul Carpenter 11:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, someone can recreate it later, as nothing can be salvaged from this article. -- Kjkolb 17:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete horribly POV. Redirect to revival meeting or some such after deleting. I can't believe we don't didn't have an article on Spring Harvest! Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:26, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete because Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedia articles, and this is not one, nor is it an attempt to make one, nor is there any evidence that an article will be made in the near future, or that if made, this would be a useful basis. Tuf-Kat 02:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No third party verification of the Holy Spirit's role in this Ruby 02:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without prejudice. Does anyone other than Christian youth ministers still use the word "radical" anymore? Haikupoet 03:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• My wife does. She has a degree in chemistry, though, so doesn't use it in quite the same way :-) Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 11:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - WarriorScribe 05:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Utter codswallop Maustrauser 11:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• I would like to say keep and rewrite. I really would. But any conditional vote like that on AFD is assumed to be a keep, and when the AFD closes as no consensus, everybody goes off and thinks "well someone's going to rewrite this" and it ends up the same way. So, delete unless rewritten before this AFD ends. Stifle 23:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per turf cat. Arbustoo 01:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep. Keep and expand. Pertinent article, lots of Google hits. --Jason Gastrich 01:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• while its true that it generates a lot of hits on google - the web pages returned don't really talk about the same thing, doesn't seem to be consensus out there what Youth Revival is --Xorkl000 03:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Per Tuf-Kat. FeloniousMonk 01:28, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: per Kjkolb. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ifnord 22:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.