Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youngsitymusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion. Carabinieri 19:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Youngsitymusic

Youngsitymusic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

There is no assertion of notability. The user has created other articles related to this that have been protected from recreation. Taking to AfD for a community definitive decision. Leebo⁸⁶ 14:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete: no assertion of notability. No need to go through AfD for clear cases such as this. --Pak21 14:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

  AfD allows for subsequent deletion per {{db-repost}} whereas speedy deletion does not, so I don't mind taking an extra minute to post it here. Leebo⁸⁶ 14:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

  If it was speediable originally, the repost is almost certainly also speediable. No need to leave the article up for 5 days; I don't think a speedily closed AfD should allow for {{db-repost}} deletions. --Pak21 14:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

  The author has since left a message on my talk page expressing confusion, despite having supposedly created many articles that were speedied (without much conversation on his talk page). Maybe I'm taking WP:AGF too far though. Leebo⁸⁶ 14:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, and I also note that Young sity needed to be salted for a previous create/delete battle. Andrwsc 17:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.