Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youngling

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Redirect. If it's a term for something else, then make an article when you can put info in about it. Golbez 08:45, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Youngling

Delete Useless. The Jedi article already has information about Younglings. Besides that, there isn't exactly a whole lot of information about them. Kross 09:53, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Jedi. -- Marcika 13:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• To Jedi, redirect. -- BD2412 ^talk 18:59, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
• As above, redirect. JYolkowski // talk 19:03, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. Mgm|^(talk) 21:27, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. No vote. Youngling isn't an exclusive term for Star Wars or whatever it is. It's just one of those vaguely Scandinavian-sounding words that shows up in a certain kind of gothic fiction. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary. All this has to do with Star Wars is that the word was used in the movies, and by that logic, "and" could be a Star Wars term too. — JIP | Talk 07:38, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Oh darn, I was hoping this would be about the USA's oldest active brewery, Yuengling. Delete, not encyclopedic, not primarily a Star Wars term to merit a redirect there. Barno 20:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jedi ··gracefool |☺ 08:24, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or transwiki as per User:JIP, it's not just a SW term. -- Lochaber 14:08, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.